Detection Coverage Management

Direct definition: Measure ATT&CK-aligned detection coverage against priority threats with governed confidence levels.

Not to be confused with: Static heatmaps alone. Coverage governance includes ownership, validation state, and operational evidence.

Best for teams who: Need to prove which priority threats are covered and where risk remains.

SecuMap applies Detection System of Record (DSoR) governance to keep ATT&CK coverage decisions auditable across threat mapping, validation, and production outcomes.

Coverage management should answer whether expected detections exist for relevant adversary behaviour and whether confidence is current.

SecuMap aligns threat intelligence and ATT&CK mapping with production context so coverage decisions are measurable and defensible.

Product evidence: detection coverage management in operation

These product screenshots show coverage from threat actor and watchlist campaign perspectives, including technique gaps and campaign threat assessment summaries.

Product screenshot of SecuMap: threat actor coverage overview with motivations, countries of origin, campaigns, associated techniques, and coverage gaps. — What you are seeing: product screenshot of SecuMap threat actor overview, including campaigns in watchlist, associated techniques, and gap indicators. Why it matters: threat-centric visibility reveals where actor-linked exposure is insufficiently covered. Decision enabled: which threat actor campaigns need immediate coverage remediation.

Product screenshot of SecuMap: watchlist priority campaigns view with campaign-level coverage and tactic coverage distribution. — What you are seeing: product screenshot of watchlist campaign coverage, showing priority campaigns with campaign-level coverage status and ATT&CK tactic coverage. Why it matters: campaign perspective links threat priority directly to measurable coverage. Decision enabled: where to prioritise engineering effort by watchlist campaign importance and current tactic coverage.

Product screenshot of SecuMap: top coverage technique gaps and campaign threat assessment summary with motivations, countries, and threat level distribution. — What you are seeing: product screenshot combining top technique coverage gaps with campaign threat assessment overview (threat levels, motivations, and countries). Why it matters: this connects ATT&CK technique shortfalls to campaign risk context. Decision enabled: which specific techniques and campaigns should be addressed first in the coverage backlog.

Coverage governance from mapping to confidence
Focus area	Operational expectation
Threat alignment	Priority adversary behaviours are mapped to ATT&CK techniques and expected controls.
Coverage evidence	Mapped logic is linked to validation history and ownership.
Confidence score	Operational outcomes and drift signals determine true coverage confidence.

Frequently asked questions

Is high ATT&CK coverage enough?

No. Coverage must be linked to validation and operational proof to be trusted.

How often should coverage be reviewed?

Continuously for critical threats, with routine governance cadence for full portfolio health.

Does SecuMap replace ATT&CK tooling?

No. SecuMap governs ATT&CK-aligned coverage evidence across your existing tools.

Next steps

See it in action Request briefing