SecuMap: The Detection System of Record for Threat-Informed Defense Your detection programme, in one system of record.
SecuMap sits above your SIEM, EDR, BAS, and CTI and answers a practical question: do your detections hold up — from threat intel to deployed logic, validation, and incidents?
It is not another alert console. It is where use cases, coverage, BAS results, and operational health meet so teams can prioritise with evidence — not slides.
Community edition · No card · Runs in your environment
Are our detections actually working today?
You already have SIEM dashboards, ATT&CK heatmaps, BAS reports, intel feeds, spreadsheets, and backlogs. Most organisations still cannot show — with evidence — whether detections work in practice right now, not on a roadmap.
SecuMap exists to make detection capability measurable, governable, and continuously improvable: a Detection System of Record, not another chart.
What is a Detection System of Record?
A Detection System of Record (DSoR) is a vendor-neutral governance layer that continuously maps threat intelligence to detection coverage, measures detection effectiveness, and governs detection health across the full threat-to-detection operating loop. It operates above SIEM, EDR, BAS, and CTI systems without replacing them — providing persistent, system-level visibility and lifecycle traceability across all execution layers.
The category is architecturally distinct from all adjacent tools. It does not ingest telemetry, enforce controls, simulate adversaries, or produce intelligence. It governs how those systems combine to produce measurable, improvable detection health.
Learn more about the Detection System →Most teams still run detection from disconnected tools and files.
The gap is rarely “more SIEM features.” It is one place that ties use cases, ATT&CK mapping, BAS output, and incidents together — with owners and lifecycle state you can audit.
Typical programme vs. governed programme
Governance layer,
not another box in the stack.
SIEMs ingest, EDRs alert, BAS tools run scenarios. None of them persist a full picture of detection health across intel, rules, validation, and live operation.
SecuMap connects those signals into one model. We do not replace your stack; we make it possible to report and improve detection using the same evidence your engineers already work from.
Technical architecture →System-level visibility across
MITRE ATT&CK and the detection lifecycle.
Tactical heatmaps and strategic MaGMa governance in one product — so coverage and maturity stay linked to deployed logic and validation.
Live visibility into adversary technique coverage and efficacy percentages.
Lifecycle governance from threat intelligence through logic authoring and control validation.
From intel to deployed logic
Use-case maturity, BAS signals, and operational drift in one traceable model — not separate spreadsheets per team.
Four questions most teams answer with guesses.
SecuMap is built to answer them from live linkage between intel, detections, validation, and operations — not from quarterly slide updates.
Questions practitioners ask
about detection governance.
Direct answers to the queries security teams bring to SecuMap.
A Detection System of Record (DSoR) is a vendor-neutral governance layer that continuously maps threat intelligence to detection coverage, measures detection effectiveness, and governs detection health across the full threat-to-detection operating loop. It operates above SIEM, EDR, BAS, and CTI systems without replacing them. Learn more →
MaGMa is a use case maturity framework for security monitoring. It structures detection use cases across Management, Growth, and Metrics & Assessment. SecuMap operationalises MaGMa within a live Detection System of Record. See the full methodology →
A SIEM is an execution layer — it ingests telemetry and generates alerts. SecuMap is a governance layer that operates above the SIEM, defines what it should detect, tracks whether detections are working, and provides lifecycle governance. The SIEM executes. SecuMap governs.
Coverage is static — it captures the presence of detection rules without indicating whether they are operational or validated. Effectiveness is dynamic — it requires lifecycle management, continuous validation, and measurement against real adversary behaviour. Coverage is a belief. Effectiveness is a discipline.
Get a serious baseline for
detection governance. Free.
No trial gimmick. A real starting point for teams who want structure before they buy.
Built for practitioners first. See all editions →